Final Fantasy X/X-2 HD Remaster Review: Re-Jecht-ed

The day Square Enix stop trying to wring money out of their old properties we’ll have all been long in the deep, cold ground. Whether it’s trickling out the occasional bolt-on to Final Fantasy VII (while skillfully avoiding the remake fans seem to want most) or trying to recreate Tomb Raider in their own image, they know how to squeeze every last drop of cash from their fan base.

Thus it’s no surprise that Final Fantasy X, probably the second best loved of the series so far, and its confusingly-titled sequel have been given the full box set treatment. Well, not exactly. Final Fantasy X comes pre-installed on the cartridge, but FFX-2 takes the form of a redeemable code for the PlayStation Store, after which you’ll have to endure a 4GB download before you can play a thing. There is a legitimate reason for this – PS Vita game cards are a remarkably small 4GB each and it might have raised the price to produce bigger storage media – but it’s the first in a series of cut corners and disappointments that plague the collection.

ffx2hd_2

There’s an amazing amount of game to play here though. Collectively the two games run well over a hundred hours for standard playthroughs, and getting two sets of 100% completion will likely take months.

Other than their length, the two games have little more than their art style in common. While Final Fantasy X plays in traditional JRPG style, with long cutscenes interspersed with battles and linear storytelling, its sequel is far more free-form and provides a mission based structure, often playable in any order.

Any readers thinking the linear storytelling of Final Fantasy X sounds more appealing should disabuse themselves of that notion as soon as possible. While linearity can help lead players through a well-written and engaging story, roadblocks are thrown up constantly in the form of a confusing introduction (which in Final Fantasy tradition goes on for some hours), overly long cutscenes and worryingly poor voice acting.

Quite why the voice acting falls so flat is a bit of a mystery, since the game makes use of an impressive cast, including James Arnold Taylor, John DiMaggio and Tara Strong. The problem is that it all sounds too game-like, the lines are spoken with no apparent sincerity and edited together as though the actors were standing in different rooms. It’s also unhelpful that the game’s ability to name the main protagonist means that characters seem to go to great pains to avoid addressing him directly.

Of course voice acting and sound editing don’t make a game, but they can act to redeem a game with rather poor writing. Perhaps it scans better in the original Japanese, but if there are many lines in the game which aren’t hammy or contrived, they’re few and far between.

final_fantasy_x_hd_02_thumb

The characters too leave a lot to be desired, although they tick the usual Final Fantasy boxes – the Blonde Guy, the Magic Girl, the Kooky Chick, the Moody One, and the ‘Ethnic’ One. The problem is that they all seem to display very little depth beyond that. The ongoing plot threads of, for example, Tidus coming to terms with his family history and identity would bear a lot more emotional weight if we ever got to know him very well. Instead, the scene everyone remembers is the awful fake laughing, and that’s rather telling.

The gameplay redeems the whole product somewhat, and across both games there’s a surprising amount of extra content in the way of minigames. Obviously the main attraction is Blitzball (despite the odd broken mechanic) but there are extra features like Gunner’s Gauntlet that distract from the main RPG segments.

Don’t misunderstand, though – these are still very much JRPGs. There are turn based battles using the traditional slowly-filling meters, numbers coming out of enemies’ heads and overwrought supermoves performed after taking damage. There’s very little to say about this. It’s tried and tested, it works well and X/X-2’s incarnations were probably the best display of Final Fantasy combat until they started mucking around with it in Final Fantasy XII.

The first game to its credit doesn’t feel 13 years old and part of that may be that the visual design still holds up reasonably well. Although fixed perspective camera is quite unnecessary on a system capable of rendering full 3D worlds, situations where it actually causes problems are quite few.

The upscaling to a higher resolution (it seems slightly dishonest to call it an HD remaster when the Vita can only display at 960×540) has been handled well and although it’s somewhat disappointing that the game uses the original art assets rather than the new engine and complete redevelopment we were promised, it’s still very attractive. The FMVs that dazzled in 2001 are now slightly more run-of-the-mill, but still do their job well.

However, even the nice graphics, bonus content previously only included in the Japanese special editions aren’t enough to save the box set from the crushing mediocrity of its story, characters and writing. Fans of course will lap it up, and have a great time playing through games they already loved with added achievements and boosted graphics, but those who haven’t played Final Fantasy before will find little for them here.

Final Fantasy X/X-2 HD Remaster, for all its heritage, provides very little reason to buy it other than for nostalgia. It’s a huge amount of game in a low-priced package, but its content is bland enough to bring to mind going to an all you can eat buffet which only serves porridge. It may bring back fond memories of cold childhood mornings, but after not too long you’ll be completely sick of it. 57%

Share this post

Robin Wilde

Co-Editor of Cubed Gamers, meaning I send out, take in, edit and upload content. I'm also in charge of doing much of the graphics and design stuff for the site.

6 comments

Add yours
  1. Calahoon 31 March, 2014 at 11:44 Reply

    I also hate when people disagree with a review just because it doesnt
    agree with their opinion on the game but this review is seriously bad.
    This line in particular made me realise you have no idea what you’re
    talking about:

    “The characters too leave a lot to be
    desired, although they tick the usual Final Fantasy boxes – the Blonde
    Guy, the Magic Girl, the Kooky Chick, the Moody One, and the ‘Ethnic’
    One. The problem is that they all seem to display very little depth
    beyond that.”

    The characters in Final Fantasy X are
    brilliantly written and each character goes well beyond titles such as
    “the magic girl”. If thats all you see when you play this game you’d be
    better off doing something else other than reviewing games or reviewing
    anything else.

    • Robin Wilde 31 March, 2014 at 14:55 Reply

      Well I disagree. At no point was I ever very interested in the characters or their motivations, in the way I have been with other games. I’d be interested to hear why you think I’m wrong! I’m going to keep reviewing games though.

      • Calahoon 31 March, 2014 at 15:23 Reply

        Well practice makes perfect I guess. The only way you’re going to get better is to keep reviewing. Each character is relatable and has a lot of back story which adds depth to the character. Kimahri, for example, cant and wont trust other people because of what happened to him with Biran and Yenke when he was younger. Thats why he doesnt talk much(as told by Yuna), doesnt talk to Tidus until well into the story and even attacks Tidus in Besaid. The game builds the confrontation with Biran and Yenke throughout the game with Kimahri both facing his demons in terms of confronting Biran and Yenke and facing his demons by trusting people like Tidus.

        The whole idea that Tidus was nameable was to give the player the idea that THEY are in the game. I agree I dont like the whole idea that they never say his name but it adds to the immersion for the player. The player knows nothing about Spira just like Tidus, has no battle experience just like Tidus and the innocence about not knowing that the summoner dies when they defeat sin is shattered at the same moment for the player as it is for Tidus. Of course thats not talking about the character’s depth but I thought I should mention that. The rest of the characters also have a lot of backstory which adds depth and goes well beyond these simple titles you’ve given them.

        “At no point was I ever VERY interested in the characters or their motivations..”

        Does that mean at some point you were interested a bit?

        • Benjamin Ibbetson 31 March, 2014 at 20:31 Reply

          I’ve gotta agree with Calahoon. The story line and character development of this redeem the crappy voice overs (which at the time were novel because they were early examples of full voice overs). The battle system is excellent with the turns being more than the usual ‘I go, you go’ of most RPGs as well as the character changeovers allowing a greater variety of tactics. The fact that it still holds up so well today is testament to how good it really is. Also, and I realise it’s devisive, but in my eyes Blitzball is the best minigame certainly in a Final Fantasy game and possibly ever.

    • Robin Wilde 30 March, 2014 at 21:24 Reply

      You know, not liking the same games everyone else does doesn’t mean I’m a troll. I bought the game on a recommendation because it looked interesting, and I was disappointed. Life, as ever, continues.

Got something to tell us? Leave a reply!